Kemal Gözler, Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparative Study (Bursa: Ekin Press, 2008)

 

cited by

 

 

1. John R. Vile, A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments, Santa Barbara, Greenwood Publishing Company, Fifth Edition, 2010, p.112. <http://books.google.com/books?id=u55Cb1sM_dEC&pg=PA112#v=onepage&q&f=false>.

 

2. Mark Tushnet, “The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review”, ANU College of Law Seminars, 20 May 2010. <http://law.anu.edu.au/news/2010_College_Seminars/Tushnet_Paper.pdf>, page 5, footnote 10.

 

3. Venice Commission, Report on constitutional amendment, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 81st Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 December 2009) on the basis of comments by Ms Gret HALLER (Member, Switzerland), Mr Fredrik SEJERSTED (Substitute member, Norway), Mr Kaarlo TUORI (Member, Finland) and Mr Jan VELAERS (Member, Belgium)  [ CDL-AD(2010)001 ]  <http://www.venice.coe.int/docs/2010/CDL-AD(2010)001-e.asp>, footnote 152

 

4. Malah Anna, Constitutional Protection in Cameroon: A Critique of the Amendment Mechanisms, Budapest, Central European University Legal Studies department, LL.M. Thesis, 2009, footnotes 11, 80, 92. <http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2009/malah_anna.pdf>.

 

5. David Kosar, "Judicial Accountability and Democratic Transition: Visegrad Story", VIII World Congress of Constitutional Law, Mexico City, Workshop 16 - Constitutional Principles and democratic Transition, 6-10 December 2010, <https://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/16/288.pdf>, page12, footnote 63.

 

6. Maxim Tomoszek, "Proportionality in Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments", VIII World Congress of Constitutional Law, Mexico City, Workshop 9 - Proportionality as a principle, 6-10 December 2010, <http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/9/175.pdf>, page 5, footnote 28.

 

7. Jasna Omejec, “The Constitutional Development of European Post-Communýst and Post-Socialist States”, The Constitution: a Basis of Democratic Development of the State, Astana, on August 27-28, 2010, <http://www.constcouncil.kz/eng/vyst/?cid=0&rid=540>, footnote 22.  
(Speech of the President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia of Jasna Omejec at the international scientific - practical conference: «the Constitution - a basis of democratic development of the state», Astana, on August, 27-28, 2010)

 

8. Constance Grewe, « Le contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois constitutionnelles en Bosnie-Herzégovine », Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, n° 27 (Dossier : Contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois constitutionnelles), Janvier 2010 <http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/documentation-publications/cahiers-du-conseil/cahier-n-27/le-controle-de-constitutionnalite-des-lois-constitutionnelles-en-bosnie-herzegovine.51429.html>  < http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/root/bank/pdf/conseil-constitutionnel-51429.pdf >, footnote 1.

 

9.  Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn, Constitutional Identity, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2010, page 35, footnote3; page 78, footnote 115. ( http://www.amazon.com/Constitutional-Identity-Gary-Jeffrey-Jacobsohn/dp/0674047664/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1301552954&sr=1-1#reader_0674047664 )

 

10. Richard S. Kay, "Constituent Authority", American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 59, Number 3, Summer 2011, p.715-761.
( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1703378 ) (footnote 45). http://comparativelaw.metapress.com/content/0536qn68350r5n43/fulltext.pdf

 

11. Kieran Williams, “When a Constitutional Amendment Violates the "Substantive Core": The Czech Constitutional Court's September 2009 Early Elections Decision”, Review of Central and East European Law, Volume 36, Number 1, 2011 , pp. 33-51. 2011,  p.33-52, foot notes 58, 59, 60, 61. ( http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/10.1163/092598811x12960354394687 )

 

12. Ali Acar, "Tension in the Turkish Constitutional Democracy: Legal Theory, Constitutional  Review And Democracy", Ankara Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, Winter 2009, p.141-172, footnotes., 4, 5, 84, 91, 95, 96, 98. ( http://www.law.ankara.edu.tr/dergi/ALR/alr-2009-06-02/alr-2009-06-02-acar.pdf )

 

13. Alec Stone Sweet. "Constitutional Courts" Forthcoming, Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, 2011, footnote 27. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/alec_stone_sweet/43  ( http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=alec_stone_sweet )

 

14. Patricia Del Arenal Urueta,  El procedimiento de reforma constitucional a la luz de los principios de la democracia deliberativa:  una alternativa para su control en sede judicial, Tesis, Instituto tecnológico autónomo de México, Mexico, 2010, p.38, 40, 46, 47, 48, 51, 69, 79, 107. ( http://www.ordenjuridico.gob.mx/Publicaciones/Tesis2011/3PrecedRefConstPrinDemocracia.pdf ).

 

15. Hugo César Araújo de Gusmăo, “El Sistema Constitucional De Irlanda”, Revista De Derecho Constitucional Europeo, (ISSN:1697-7890),  Ańo 8, número 15, Enero-Junio de 2011, Págs. 261-284 (p.269, footnote 3, 5),

( http://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE15pdf/ReDCE15.pdf ) ( http://www.ugr.es/~redce/REDCE15/articulos/06HCAraujo.htm )
 

16. Ozan O. Varol, "The Origins and Limits of Originalism: A Comparative Study", Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Volume 44, Number 5, November 2011, p.1239-1297,  (p.1291, footnote 317) ( http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/journal-of-transnational-law/download.aspx?id=7463 )

 

17. Aharon Barak, "Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments",  Israel Law Review, Vol 44, 2011, p.321-341 footnotes 11-18, 42, 47, 56, 58. (http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/44Barak.pdf)

 

18. Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.222, 231, 238, 439, 821. ( http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=uP3VWeTMnxsC&pg= )

 

Mark Tushnet, "Constitution", in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.222, footnote 21.

Klaude Klein and András Sajó, "Constitution-Making: Process and Substance", in Michel Rosenfeld and András Sajó (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, p.439, footnote 84.

 

19. Lech Garlicki & Zofia A. Garlicka, “External Review of Constitutional Amendments? Internatýonal Law as a Norm of Reference”, Israel Law Review, Vol 44, 2011, p.343-367, footnotes 8, 18. ( http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/44Garlicki.pdf )

 

20. Roberto Toniatti, Mattia Magrassi, Magistratura, giurisdizione ed equilibri istituzionali. Dinamiche e confronti europei e comparati, Milano, Univ. Trento. Dip. scienze giuridiche, CEDAM, 2011,  p.586, footnote 36 ( books.google.com.tr/books?isbn=8813308027 ; http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=l7vTUvKnw8oC&hl=tr  ).

 

21. Yaniv Roznai and Serkan Yolcu, "An unconstitutional constitutional amendment - The Turkish perspective: A comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s headscarf decision", International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2012, Vol. 10, No. 1, p.175–207, p.193, footnote 81, p.195, footnote 91, 93; p.196, footnote 94, 95, 96; p.197; p.198, footnote 103, ( http://icon.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/1/175.abstract )
 

22. Juan Gabriel Gómez Albarello, "Reformas inconstitucionales a la constitución: żun caso agravado de la tensión entre la democracia y el constitucionalismo", Análisis Político, nş 75, Bogotá, Mayo-Agosto, 2012, p. 67-88,  ( http://www.iepri.org/docs/libros/60apol75.pdf ) ((p. 73, footnotes 5, 8;  p. 82, 86)

 

23. Valentina Bărbăţeanu, “ The Influence of the Constitutional Jurisdictions on the Basic Laws”, LESIJ (Lex ET Scientia. Juridical Series), No XIX, Vol. 2/2012, p.137-148 ( http://lexetscientia.univnt.ro/download/460_460_lesij_js_XIX_2_2012_art_009.pdf ), p.145, footnote 38

 

24. Otto Pfersmann, “Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a normativist approach”, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht, March 2012, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp.81-113 ( http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00708-012-0130-x#  ), p.103, footnote 23.

 

25. Drinóczi Tímea, "Gondolatok az Alkotmánybíróság 61/2011. (VII. 12.) AB határozatával kapcsolatban", JURA: a Pécsi Tudományegyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Karának tudományos lapja, 2012/1. számp, page 37-46 (p.41, 46, end notes 36, 40, 45, 46, 51).

     ("Reflections on Constitutional Court Decisions 61/2011, July 12th", Legal Review of the Law Faculty of the University of Pécs, ( http://jura.ajk.pte.hu/JURA_2012_1.pdf )

 

26. Jiří Novák, Problematika tzv. nezměnitelných a nezrušitelných ustanovení v ústavách, Právnická fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Magisterský studijní program právo a právní věda, http://is.muni.cz/th/257112/pravf_m/Diplomova_prace.txtv , notes 51, 170.

 

27. Ясна Омежек, “Новые европейские конституции переходного периода и преобразующая роль конституционных судов”, Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения, № 2, 2012, стр.10-26. (http://www.nbpublish.com/ilmag/mag_contents_2_2012_18249.html ) [Jasna Omejec, “New European Transition Constitutions and the Transformative Role of Constitutional Courts”, Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, No 2, 2012, p.10-26, footnote 15 ( http://www.nbpublish.com/engilm/mag_contents_2_2012_18250.html  ]

 

 

 

 


Editor: Kemal Gözler

 

E-mail: kgozler[at]hotmail.com

Home: www.anayasa.gen.tr

Creation Date:  May 27, 2010

Last Updated: December 12, 2012